Italy’s Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi arrives at the Justice Palace in Milan April 11, 2011. A defiant Berlusconi arrived in court on Monday to face the latest in a series of trials over the coming weeks on charges ranging from tax fraud to paying for sex with a minor.
A defiant Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi arrived in court today to face the latest in a series of trials over the coming weeks on charges ranging from tax fraud to paying for sex with a minor.
“I will not be convicted,” Berlusconi told reporters confidently as he entered the courthouse, with a crowd of supporters cheering him on.
He said magistrates, whom he has accused of being politically biased leftists, had hurled “an incredible amount of mud” at him “and the whole country”.
His appearance at the tax fraud trial contrasted with his decision to stay away from the opening of a more embarrassing case last week over his relations with an under-age prostitute, which his lawyers are trying to have quashed.
He called the prostitution charges against him “groundless.”
Today’s trial centres on charges that Berlusconi’s Mediaset broadcasting empire bought TV and film rights at inflated prices through offshore front companies, leaving the difference to be skimmed off to avoid tax and create secret slush funds.
Both Mediaset and Berlusconi deny the charges. Judges were expected to question some defence witnesses at today’s hearing.
The billionaire centre-right prime minister has dismissed opposition calls to resign and, after overcoming a damaging party split last year, appears to have the numbers in parliament to serve out his term until 2013.
The Mediaset trial is one of a series of three connected trials, all linked to the sale of television and film rights dating back to the 1990s.
It is not related to the more sensational “Rubygate” case in which the prime minister is accused of paying for sex with a teenage nightclub dancer when she was under the age of 18 and thus too young under Italian law to be paid as a prostitute.
As he entered the courthouse today, Berlusconi said he was only trying to help the girl, Karima El Mahroug, “because she told me a story that moved me” and he had wanted to help her find a job.
Berlusconi, who has faced at least a dozen trials over the years, denies all charges against him and says he has been victimised by leftist magistrates who are using the legal system to bring him down.
His government has been pushing through legislation to curb the powers of the magistrates, prompting critics to accuse him of trying to pass specially tailored laws that would allow him to escape trial altogether.
The trials were effectively suspended by a measure passed by his government which allowed him to claim that his official duties meant he did not have enough time to prepare his defence and could therefore claim immunity from trial while in office.
The constitutional court ruled against the measure in January, prompting magistrates to re-open the fraud trials and bring the prostitution case to court
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Monday, April 11, 2011
Monday, February 14, 2011
Woman suing McDonalds after finding GLASS in her McChicken
Law suit: McDonalds are being sued for $600,000 after a McChicken Sandwich contained glass
Vjolla Lecaj, from Chicago, suffered ‘severe and permanent oral injuries’ her legal team have alleged in their claim.
She is suing the fast food giants for £375,000 ($600,000) following the incident.
Ms Lecaj was eating in McDonalds in Oak Lawn, Illinois, when she chewed on the glass – without realising it was there.
She is claiming product liability and negligence in the 12-count claim against McDonalds.
The restaurant is accused of not inspecting and maintaining equipment or checking the sandwich in the indictment.
The incident happened on August 5 last year, according to the writ filed at Cook County Circuit Court.
Ms Lecaj suffered ‘great pain and anguish’, it is alleged.
She is taking action against the Oak Lawn branch, McDonald’s Corporation, McDonald’s USA, LLC and JDD Investment Company.
None of those named in the writ have made any comment.
HK feng shui master loses appeal for billionaire’s wealth
Happy family: Nina Wang siblings (from left) Kung Yan-sum, Yan-fum and Molly Cong hold a news conference in Hong Kong today February 14, 2011.Younger brother Kung Yan-sum: Greed doesn’t pay
The former lover of late Hong Kong billionaire Nina Wang today lost an appeal to secure control of her wealth, when the high court upheld a previous judgement in a bitter probate battle.
A little over a year ago, a Hong Kong court had ruled that a will leaving Wang’s entire US$4 billion (RM12.2 billion) estate, one of Asia’s largest fortunes, to her former lover and feng shui master, Tony Chan, was a forgery.
The court said the money would instead go to charity. Chan appealed against the decision.
In a brief hearing, a panel of three judges from Hong Kong’s court of appeal said they “had no hesitation in dismissing this appeal”.
“The first defendant (Chan) has persisted in pursuing a thoroughly dishonest case. In doing so, he has abused the process of the court,” Justice Anthony Rogers told a packed courtroom.
Local media reported that Chan, a married father of three, would appeal against the new ruling, likely further prolonging the court battle that has gripped a city obsessed with celebrities.
The twists and turns featured revelations of adultery and bizarre rituals associated with feng shui, a Chinese philosophy stressing the influence of outside forces on a building or space.
Wang, known as “Little Sweetie”, was one of Asia’s wealthiest women with a business empire including the Chinachem Group, Hong Kong’s largest private property developer. She died of cancer in 2007, aged 69.
After her death, Chan produced a 2006 will that bequeathed Wang’s estate to him, contradicting a 2002 will that left the fortune to the Chinachem Charitable Foundation, overseen by members of Wang’s family.
Wang, born in Shanghai, inherited most of her wealth from her husband, Teddy, who was kidnapped in 1990 and never seen alive again despite the payment of a US$33 million ransom. She later fought a legal battle for control of the estate with her nonagenarian father-in-law.
In the latest 47-page judgement, the judges supported an earlier ruling that the signatures purporting to be those of Nina Wang in the 2006 will were forgeries. They described Chan as “untrustworthy and a liar, tailoring his evidence to suit his case as he went along”.
Wang’s brother, Kung Yan-sum, a director with the Chinachem Group, hailed the ruling as just. “He (Chan) was greedy, and that’s why he lost,” he told Hong Kong’s Cable Television. “I’m very, very happy.”
Monday, October 18, 2010
British photographer wins £82,000 damages after US porn firm uses picture of her AGED 14 on cover of explicit DVD
A photographer who sued a US porn film company for using a picture of her aged 14 on the cover of one of its DVDs has won £82,000 damages.
Lara Jade Coton was ‘horrified’ that her self-portrait, which was on the internet, had been used as the DVD cover and face art for the sexually explicit film Body Magic without her permission.
Miss Coton went on to sue the firm, TVX Films of Texas, after she complained and received an email blaming her for disappointing sales of the DVD, her lawyer Richard Harrison said.
A self portrait of Lara Jade Coton taken when she was 14-years-old appeared as the cover of the pornographic film Body Magic
Professional photographer Miss Coton has been awarded £82,000 in damages
She filed a lawsuit in federal court in Tampa, Florida, which accused TVX Films and its president Bob Burge of copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, misappropriation of her image, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The judge who awarded Miss Coton’s damages blasted the company’s actions as ‘morally wrong’ and said the use of her image wrongly implied she worked in the porn industry.
Now 21, Miss Coton, of Tamworth, Staffordshire told the Mirror: ‘I didn’t want to be known as the girl from the porn film. I’m delighted it’s finally out the way.
‘It’s not about the money – I had to defend my rights in work as well as my character and professional reputation.’
During the three-year legal battle, Miss Cotton told of her disgust of how the image was used: ‘I was absolutely horrified to see my work and my own picture being used on that kind of movie. It’s just appalling.’
Mr Harrison, of law firm Allen Dell PA, said when Miss Coton contacted the film company, its president Bob Burge responded by ridiculing her and accusing her of trying to perpetrate some kind of scam.
Mr Harrison said: ‘Adding insult to injury the company had the audacity to blame Lara Jade for the disappointing sales of its porn movie.’
He said TVX Films president Bob Burge wrote in an email: ‘Actually, removing your image will help improve the sale of the DVD. So far it bombed.’
Mr Harrison said: ‘If it’s not a crime to put a 14-year-old child on the cover of a porn video, it sure ought to be.’
Mr Harrison said the case showed how easily children could be victimised in the age of social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook.
‘This amazing technology allows us all to share our photos with friends and loved ones, but parents must realise that any picture a child puts on the internet is about three mouse clicks away from being stolen by anybody,’ he said.



Lara Jade Coton was ‘horrified’ that her self-portrait, which was on the internet, had been used as the DVD cover and face art for the sexually explicit film Body Magic without her permission.
Miss Coton went on to sue the firm, TVX Films of Texas, after she complained and received an email blaming her for disappointing sales of the DVD, her lawyer Richard Harrison said.
A self portrait of Lara Jade Coton taken when she was 14-years-old appeared as the cover of the pornographic film Body Magic
Professional photographer Miss Coton has been awarded £82,000 in damages
She filed a lawsuit in federal court in Tampa, Florida, which accused TVX Films and its president Bob Burge of copyright infringement, civil conspiracy, misappropriation of her image, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The judge who awarded Miss Coton’s damages blasted the company’s actions as ‘morally wrong’ and said the use of her image wrongly implied she worked in the porn industry.
Now 21, Miss Coton, of Tamworth, Staffordshire told the Mirror: ‘I didn’t want to be known as the girl from the porn film. I’m delighted it’s finally out the way.
‘It’s not about the money – I had to defend my rights in work as well as my character and professional reputation.’
During the three-year legal battle, Miss Cotton told of her disgust of how the image was used: ‘I was absolutely horrified to see my work and my own picture being used on that kind of movie. It’s just appalling.’
Mr Harrison, of law firm Allen Dell PA, said when Miss Coton contacted the film company, its president Bob Burge responded by ridiculing her and accusing her of trying to perpetrate some kind of scam.
Mr Harrison said: ‘Adding insult to injury the company had the audacity to blame Lara Jade for the disappointing sales of its porn movie.’
He said TVX Films president Bob Burge wrote in an email: ‘Actually, removing your image will help improve the sale of the DVD. So far it bombed.’
Mr Harrison said: ‘If it’s not a crime to put a 14-year-old child on the cover of a porn video, it sure ought to be.’
Mr Harrison said the case showed how easily children could be victimised in the age of social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook.
‘This amazing technology allows us all to share our photos with friends and loved ones, but parents must realise that any picture a child puts on the internet is about three mouse clicks away from being stolen by anybody,’ he said.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Arrest Warrant Issued for Lindsay Lohan - Lohan's Lovelace film in doubt
Lindsay Lohan's current film is up in the air after an arrest warrant was issued for the Hollywood actress.
Film bosses for the Linda Lovelace biopic Inferno, which stars the troubled 24-year-old as the infamous porn actress, are unsure as to whether production will continue."The current analysis of how to proceed cannot be concluded until the court decision is known," producer Chris Hanley told E! News.He declared that, should the show go on, she will have to stay sober.
"Formally, the terms of the acting services agreement would be such that Lindsay would not violate any obligation she would have to fulfil with the court, with her probation, or with the production insurance," Chris added.
"Informally, as far as I am concerned that would include being 100 per cent sober, yes. The actual contractual wording would be more legal to include making sure the movie production would not be compromised in any way."
Director Matthew Wilder said despite the constant change in the production schedule, the cast and crew are pulling together."Every other part of the prep is going on regardless. It will work out one way or another," he said.

Film bosses for the Linda Lovelace biopic Inferno, which stars the troubled 24-year-old as the infamous porn actress, are unsure as to whether production will continue."The current analysis of how to proceed cannot be concluded until the court decision is known," producer Chris Hanley told E! News.He declared that, should the show go on, she will have to stay sober.
"Formally, the terms of the acting services agreement would be such that Lindsay would not violate any obligation she would have to fulfil with the court, with her probation, or with the production insurance," Chris added.
"Informally, as far as I am concerned that would include being 100 per cent sober, yes. The actual contractual wording would be more legal to include making sure the movie production would not be compromised in any way."
Director Matthew Wilder said despite the constant change in the production schedule, the cast and crew are pulling together."Every other part of the prep is going on regardless. It will work out one way or another," he said.
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Swedish police to question WikiLeaks founder
Swedish police are to question WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange over alleged molestation, Sweden’s chief prosecutor said yesterday, but a second case against him has been dropped, she said.
“The investigation is still going on. I find there is a suspicion of molestation,” Eva Finne told Reuters Television.
“I’m going to tell the investigator to contact the suspect’s lawyer and they decide when it’s possible to hold an interrogation,” she said.
Assange, an Australian behind the whistle-blowing website, had been accused by two women of sexual molestation in Sweden, where he has spent the past couple of weeks.
Finne said there were no grounds to continue an investigation into a case which initially led a duty prosecutor to issue an arrest warrant for Assange for suspected rape.
That warrant was dropped on Saturday.
Assange has said through Twitter he is innocent of the accusations.
Claes Borgstrom, a lawyer representing the two women, was critical of the chief prosecutor’s decision. “I’m a little bit disappointed,” he told Reuters by telephone.
WikiLeaks, which published secret US military files on the war in Afghanistan last month, said it plans to release a document from the Central Intelligence Agency yesterday.
Assange told Al Jazeera television on Sunday that he was warned by Australian intelligence of plans to discredit Wikileaks as it prepares to release more secret documents.
Finne dismissed any suggestion of a smear campaign.
“There is no indication whatsoever that supports a conspiracy theory,” she said.
The punishment for molestation in Sweden is usually a fine but can also be up to one year in prison, she said.
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Mandela charity trustee quits over Campbell gems
Nelson Mandela charity trustee Jeremy Ractliffe has resigned after admitting to keeping uncut diamonds he received from British supermodel Naomi Campbell in 1997.
Ractliffe, who was head of the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund (NMCF) at the time, owned up to having the gems after Campbell mentioned them in testimony at The Hague war crimes trial of former Liberian leader Charles Taylor.
Prosecutors had been trying to prove the gems were “blood diamonds” given to Campbell by Taylor after a charity dinner in Johannesburg. The model said she did not know the anonymous donor of the “dirty looking pebbles”.
The three precious stones are now in the hands of the South African police, and Ractliffe faces possible charges of being in possession of uncut diamonds without a licence, a crime in South Africa.
“He hasn’t been charged yet,” said Musa Zondi, a spokesman for the police’s elite Hawks unit, adding that investigations were continuing.
Ractliffe said he took the stones from Campbell because he feared she might be breaking the law if she took them out of the country. She had suggested he sell the stones and use the money for good causes, although he thought it more prudent simply to keep them.
“Mr Ractliffe regrets his omission to inform the NMCF of his receipt of the uncut diamonds until now,” the Fund said in a statement on his resignation as a trustee of the former South African president’s charitable foundation.
Taylor is accused in The Hague of rape, sexual slavery and recruiting child soldiers during wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone. Prosecutors allege he received conflict diamonds from Sierra Leone rebels and used them to buy weapons, which he denies.
Monday, August 16, 2010
Singer in Germany's top girl band facing jail as she admits having sex with men without telling them she had HIV
Appearing for a TV performance in Nuremberg, the four members of the group were in their heyday compared to the Spice Girls or Girls Aloud. L-R Nadja Benaissa, Lucy Diakowska, Sandy M lling, and Jessica Wahls
Nadja Benaissa appeared in court yesterday charged with grievous bodily harm for allegedly infecting one of her lovers with the virus.
The 28-year-old has also been charged with attempted aggravated assault for allegedly having unprotected sex with two other men who did not contract HIV.
Reformed: The band rehearsing at Eurovision in 2008. (L-R) Lucy Diakowska, Jessica Wahls, Sandy Moelling and Nadja Benaissa
Fallen star: Benaissa on stage during Eurovision 2008
No Angel: Nadja Benaissa has admitted she was 'careless'
Brief encounters: Benaissa had a small smile on her face throughout much of the proceedings this morning
'I am sorry with all my heart': Nadja Benaissa, singer of German girl band 'No Angels', sits in a courtroom in Darmstadt, Germany, today
Benaissa, who is a member of Germany's most successful girl band, No Angels, and has performed in the Eurovision Song Contest, denies infecting anyone deliberately.
But she told the District Court of Darmstadt she was 'careless during those days' and admitted she did not tell her sexual partners about her condition, adding tearfully: 'I am sorry with all my heart.'
A 34-year-old former lover, who is now HIV positive, claimed the singer's management tried to buy his silence after he became infected.
The man said he slept with Benaissa five to seven times over a three-month period in 2004.
He maintained a platonic relationship with her after the affair ended, and said it was the star's aunt who told him in 2007 that her niece was HIV positive.
He told the court: 'My quality of life has shrunk enormously. I cannot travel to many countries.
'I have been told by my doctor my condition can become full-blown Aids at any time.'
He added that Benaissa's management had offered him a deal to remain silent, but claimed he told them he wanted her to go public about her condition and pay 100,000 euros to an Aids research charity.
If she had done this, he insisted, he would not have gone to the police.
Benaissa's lawyer read a statement from her, saying: 'It was said to me that the probability of me passing on the virus was practically zero.
'Therefore I also concealed the fact that I was infected to my acquaintances.
'I did not want my daughter to be branded by this. I told the band members because I trusted them. I never made it public because I thought that would mean the end of the band.'
In her statement, Benaissa told the court she became addicted to crack cocaine at 14 and that during her pregnancy at 16, she found out that she was HIV positive.
The court heard she had sexual encounters with the three men between 2000 and 2004.
If found guilty, she could be jailed for up to ten years.
No Angels were discovered in 2000 during the TV talent show Popstars.
They are Germany's most successful girl band and sold five million albums from 2000 to 2003.
They reformed in 2007 and competed in the 2008 Eurovision Song contest but only came in 23rd.
Labels:
AIDS,
celebrities,
court,
investigation,
Police
Sunday, August 15, 2010
'Craigslist killing' suspect dead, likely suicide
In this June 22, 2009 file photo, former Boston University medical student Philip Markoff, center, stands with his attorney John Salsberg, right, during his arraignment in Suffolk Superior Court, Monday, June 22, 2009, in Boston. Officials confirmed that Markoff was found dead of apparent suicide in his jail cell Sunday, Aug. 15, 2010 in Boston.
A former medical student accused of killing a masseuse he met through Craigslist apparently killed himself inside a Boston jail, where he was awaiting trial, authorities said Sunday.
Philip Markoff's body was found Sunday morning in the Nashua Street Jail after an apparent suicide, said Ed Geary, a spokesman for the Suffolk County sheriff's office. Geary said no additional information was immediately available, and an investigation had begun.
Saturday would have been Markoff's first wedding anniversary, but his nuptials were canceled after his arrest.
Markoff, 24, a former Boston University student, pleaded not guilty in fatal shooting of Julissa Brisman, of New York City, and the armed robbery of a Las Vegas woman. Both crimes happened at Boston hotels within the span of four days in April 2009. Rhode Island prosecutors also accused him of attacking a stripper during the same week.
In this April 21, 2009 file photo, Boston University medical student Philip Markoff stands during his arraignment in Boston Municipal Court, in Boston on charges that he fatally shot a masseuse he had lured to his hotel through Craigslist. Officials confirmed that Markoff was found dead of apparent suicide in his jail cell Sunday, Aug. 15, 2010 in Boston.
Officials confirmed that Markoff was found dead of apparent suicide in his jail cell Sunday, Aug. 15, 2010 in Boston.
His trial in the Massachusetts cases was expected in March.
Markoff's lawyer, John Salsberg, said he was shocked and saddened about his client's death. He would not comment further.
Markoff had met the women through advertisements for erotic services posted on Craigslist, a classified advertising Web site, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors said the Boston Police Department crime lab identified two blood stains taken from swabs on a handgun that was seized during a search of Markoff's apartment in Quincy, Mass. Prosecutors alleged that Markoff used the weapon to bludgeon Brisman before the victim was shot three times at close range.
Investigators also found several other items in the apartment, including four pairs of women's underwear wrapped inside of socks and hidden in a box spring.
Markoff was engaged at the time of his arrest. His fiancee, Megan McAllister, ended the relationship with Markoff after visiting him in jail, and their wedding, scheduled for Aug. 14, 2009, was subsequently canceled.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Naomi Campbell says ‘nothing to gain’ from diamonds
A frame grab shows British supermodel Naomi Campbell testifying at the UN Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam August 5, 2010.
Supermodel Naomi Campbell said yesterday she had nothing to gain from being untruthful in her testimony about alleged “blood diamonds” and said suggestions she did not care about suffering in Africa were hurtful.
In a statement issued five days after testifying in The Hague at the war crimes trial of former Liberian president Charles Taylor, Campbell described herself as “a black woman who has and will always support good causes, especially relating to Africa.”
“I’ve no motive here. Nothing to gain,” she said.
Campbell, 40, said last week that she was given some “dirty looking pebbles” after a 1997 charity dinner she attended with Taylor and others but did not know if they were blood diamonds or who they were from. She handed them to a South African charity the next day.
Testimony two days ago by actress Mia Farrow and model agent Carole White, who were also at the dinner, contradicted parts of her evidence.
“Naomi Campbell was in South Africa helping a charity, had the diamonds for a matter of hours and handed them over to a representative of Nelson Mandela’s children’s charity.
“She was not on trial in The Hague and was as helpful towards the court as she could be,” the statement said.
Campbell was summoned by prosecutors to support their allegations that Taylor received blood diamonds from rebels in Sierra Leone and used them to buy weapons. He denies 11 counts, including rape, sexual slavery and the conscription of child soldiers during wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone.
The statement, issued via a London-based PR agency, said Campbell had a long commitment to supporting good causes, especially in Africa.
“The suggestion that Campbell in some way doesn’t care about the plight of those suffering in Africa is ridiculous and hurtful,” it said.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Judge rules against Obama's drilling moratorium
A judge on Tuesday ruled against the Obama administration's six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling in the wake of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, a blow to the White House which had hoped the ban would provide time to ensure other wells are operating safely.
A lawsuit was filed by Louisiana-based Hornbeck Offshore Services LLC and was joined by more than a dozen companies involved in offshore drilling operations to reverse the drilling ban imposed by the U.S. Department of Interior.
A federal judge in Louisiana granted the drillers' request for a preliminary restraining order that would prevent the ban from taking effect.
Labels:
BP,
court,
environment disaster,
oil spill,
President Barack Obama
Friday, April 2, 2010
Japan charges New Zealand anti-whaling activist-World whaling body could collapse if deal fails: NZealand
Former New Zealand prime minister Geoffrey Palmer`
Whalers cut open a 35-tonne Fin whale in June 2009
Japan has announced their charges against New Zealand anti-whaling protester Pete Bethune, local media reported Friday.
Japan is laying five charges against Bethune over his boarding of the Shonan Maru 2 in the Southern Ocean, Radio Newstalk ZB reported on Friday.
They accused him of trespass, possession of a weapon, injury to persons, damage to property and obstructing the passage of a vessel.
Bethune's lawyer Dan Harris said it is potentially a very serious situation.
Bethune was the skipper of the Sea Shepherd protest boat, Ady Gil, which sank following a collision with the Shonan Maru II in January.
He had planned to make a citizen's arrest of the ship's captain Hiroyuki Komiya in February, for what he said was the attempted murder of his six crew, and to present him with the bill for the trimaran.
The international body to control whaling worldwide could collapse if a deal cannot be reached to allow restricted commercial whaling, New Zealand's representative said Thursday.
Former New Zealand prime minister Geoffrey Palmer, who chairs an International Whaling Commission (IWC) group trying to negotiate a deal, said the IWC could fall apart.
"I think there is a big risk of that and I don't relish it," Palmer told reporters in Wellington.
"We cannot afford to see the end of the International Whaling Commission because if it comes to an end, there will be no international instrument for protecting the whales."
New Zealand is opposed to whaling but is supporting moves to allow restricted commercial whaling over the next 10 years if it means a big cut to the number of whales currently killed by Iceland, Norway and Japan.
Under an IWC moratorium introduced in 1986 commercial whaling was suspended, but Iceland and Norway ignore the edict while Japan uses a loophole allowing lethal scientific research.
Palmer said the three countries had been increasing the number of whales they hunted in recent years.
"At the moment the number of whales for which quotas have been issued are more than 3,000 -- that should be halved and indeed that may not be enough in some places, at some times, and for some stocks."
"We are talking about a big reduction in the total number of whales killed compared with now," he said.
"An emotional attachment to a moratorium that is not working is not in my view realistic."
Palmer is travelling to Washington next week for a meeting of 30 countries involved in the IWC group trying to hammer out a deal in time for the commission's annual meeting in Morocco in June.
There is an April 22 deadline for coming up with a submission to go forward to the annual meeting.
Palmer said he was not confident the opposing sides of the whaling argument could agree on a workable deal, but said it was important they were still talking.
New Zealand Foreign Minister Murray McCully also described a deal as "a long shot" but said it was worth trying.
"All the alternatives to holding these discussions are truly awful," he said.
Australia has taken a harder line, saying it will take Japan to the International Court of Justice if it does not agree by November to stop hunting in Antarctic waters.
New Zealand said it there was a good chance court action would fail, leaving controls on hunting weaker than ever.
Friday, March 19, 2010
'Gays in Dutch army responsible for Bosnian genocide,' claims former Nato commander at U.S. Senate hearing
Gen. John Sheehan at yesterday's Senate Armed Services Committee meeting in Washington. The hearing was to examine the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy in the U.S. armed forces
Mass grave: Nearly 8,000 people were killed in the Srebrenica massacre. The U.S. general claims this was partly due 'openly gay' men being in the army
A retired U.S. and Nato general said Dutch troops were overrun during the Srebrenica massacre - because of the presence of gay soldiers, it has been claimed.
The massacre, during the Bosnian War, was the worst in Europe since World War II.
Some 8,000 Muslim boys and men were killed after Bosnian Serb forces overran lightly armed Dutch soldiers in the United Nations-designated enclave of Srebrenica in July 1995.
The shameful incident has long been mired in controversy but has now taken a fresh twist after the comments of John Sheehan, a former Nato commander who retired from the military 1997.
Speaking in Washington at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on the military's 'don't ask, don't tell policy, which bans homosexuals from openly serving in uniform, Sheehan said the inclusion of gay troops had led to a collapse in morale.
The Pentagon’s top leaders have declared their support for a repeal of the American law, which has stood for 17 years.
And President Barack Obama has said he wants to work with Congress to support the move – but has so far resisted pleas by gay rights groups to instantly mandate a change.
Yesterday, Committee chairman Senator Carl Levin told Gen Sheehan his comments were 'totally off-target'.
Srebrenica was a United Nations safe haven under the protection of Dutch peacekeepers when, in 1995, Bosnian Serb forces overran the town.
The general told yesterday's hearing that European militaries deteriorated after the collapse of the Soviet Union and focused on peacekeeping because 'they did not believe the Germans were going to attack again or the Soviets were coming back'.
Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and other nations believed there was no longer a need for an active combat capability in the militaries, he said.
'They declared a peace dividend and made a conscious effort to socialise their military - that includes the unionisation of their militaries, it includes open homosexuality.'
Dutch troops serving as UN peacekeepers and tasked with defending the town of Srebrenica in 1995 were an example of a force that became ill-equipped for war.
'The battalion was understrength, poorly led, and the Serbs came into town, handcuffed the soldiers to the telephone poles, marched the Muslims off, and executed them,' said Gen Sheehan.
'That was the largest massacre in Europe since World War II,' he said of the killings.
The events in Srebrenica remain a sensitive subject in the Netherlands, where a six-year investigation into the massacre led to the government's fall in 2002.
Senator Levin, a Democrat and a proponent of ending restrictions on gays serving in the U.S. armed forces, appeared incredulous at the general's remarks.
'Did the Dutch leaders tell you it (the fall of Srebrenica) was because there were gay soldiers there?' he asked.
'Yes,' Gen Sheehan said.
'They included that as part of the problem.'
He said the former chief of staff of the Dutch army had told him.
Sen Levin said it may be the case that some militaries have focused on peacekeeping to the detriment of their war-fighting skills.
'But I think that any effort to connect that failure on the part of the Dutch to the fact that they have homosexuals, or did allow homosexuals, I think is totally off-target,' he said.
'The Dutch military, as you point out, were peacekeepers and not peace-enforcers. I agree with that,' said Levin.
'But what the heck that has to do with the issue before us is what mystifies me.'
The Dutch Defence Ministry issued a statement calling Sheehan's claims 'absolute nonsense' and adding that gay Dutch soldiers routinely co-operate with the U.S. military in the Nato mission in Afghanistan.
Renee Jones-Bos, the Dutch ambassador to the United States, said in a statement, 'I couldn't disagree more' with Sheehan, adding there was no evidence of his claims in the extensive record of research on Srebrenica.
Dutch press agency ANP quoted the head of the military union AFMP, Wim van den Burg, as saying Sheehan's comments were 'ridiculous' and 'out of the realm of fiction'.
Dutch Defence Ministry spokesman Roger Van de Wetering dismissed the retired general's claims as nonsense.
'For us it is unbelievable that a man of this rank is stating this nonsense, because that is what it is,' he said.
'The whole operation in Srebrenica and the drama that took place over there was thoroughly investigated by Dutch and international authorities and none of these investigations has ever concluded or suggested a link between homosexual military personnel and the things that happened over there.
'I do not know on what facts this is based, but for us it is total nonsense.'
On the Dutch attitude to gays in the military, he said: "For us it is very simple: Every man or woman that meets the criteria physically and mentally is welcome to serve in our armed forces regardless of (religious) belief, sexual preference or whatever.'
'Safe haven' massacre: What happened at Srebrenica?
In 1995 the Bosnian town of Srebrenica was a UN safe haven under the protection of Dutch peacekeepers.
That year, tens of thousands of civilians had taken refuge there, seeking shelter from the destruction of the Bosnian-Serbian war.
By July of 1995 the town was under siege, with 600 lightly-armed Dutch peacekeepers facing off against the Serbian forces. Food was running out.
As pleas to Nato for help failed, Serbian forces overran the town.
Up to 8,000 Muslim men and boys are believed to have been killed in the five days of the fall of Srebrenica.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Obama aides mull September 11 suspect military trial- Recommend to be trial in military court instead of civilian court.
In this photo of a sketch by a courtroom artist, and reviewed by the U.S. military, family members of victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks, (R) observe courtroom proceedings during hearings for the five alleged September 11 co-conspirators, inside the courthouse at the Camp Justice compound for the U.S. war crimes commission, at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Bas
Advisers to President Barack Obama are close to recommending that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-professed mastermind of the September 11, 2001, attacks, be tried in a military tribunal instead of a civilian court, the Washington Post reported on Thursday.
This would be a reversal of Attorney General Eric Holder's plan for Mohammed and four other suspects in the 2001 attacks to stand trial in a civilian court in New York City.
Obama administration officials have reconsidered the plan amid objections by some lawmakers who have balked at security costs and the idea of granting full legal rights to the suspects.
If Obama agrees to his advisers' likely recommendation, the White House could get from Congress the funding and legal authority it needs to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the Post reported.
"If this stunning reversal comes to pass, President Obama will deal a death blow to his own Justice Department, not to mention American values," Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a statement.
The ACLU statement said there have been more than 300 terrorism-related convictions in the U.S. federal courts, compared with only three in military commissions, two resulting in sentences of less than a year.
Administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the president's legal advisers are finalizing their review of the cases of Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators, the Post reported.
The Post reported that White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said that "no decisions have been made," when asked about the process.
Last Thursday, the Obama administration urged the U.S. Congress to steer clear of directing where terrorism suspects should be prosecuted, pushing back against efforts to require military rather than civilian trials.\
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Bosnian leader: 'Ethnic cleansing' continues 15 years after war
----
As the genocide trial of former Bosnian Serb Leader Radovan Karadzic resumed Monday in the Netherlands, a member of Bosnia-Herzegovina's rotating presidency said that, in effect, "ethnic cleansing" continues -- 15 years after a brutal civil war there ended.
"The ethnic cleansing is there because people did not come back to their homes. Hundreds of thousands of them are around the world today and that's the problem," Haris Silajdzic, a Bosnian Muslim, told CNN's Christiane Amanpour.
"The ethnic divisions continued because people did not go back, were not allowed to go back, to their homes, including Srebrenica, where the genocide took place, and other places, too."
His comments came on the same day that Karadzic, who faces 11 charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide during the 1992-1995 Bosnian conflict, told an international tribunal in The Hague that the Serb cause is "just and holy" .
The charges relate to the killing of almost 100,000 people in the war, many of them in "ethnic cleansing," a term first coined in the Bosnian conflict. Yugoslavia -- once a multi-ethnic state of Serbs, Croats and Muslims -- dissolved into six countries during the bloody conflict in the early 1990s.
Among other things, Karadzic is accused of being responsible for the 44-month siege of the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo, in which some 10,000 people were killed, and the 1995 ethnic cleansing of the U.N.-protected enclave of Srebrenica, where more than 7,000 Bosnian men and boys were slaughtered in the worst genocide in Europe since World War II.
Silajdzic said the divisions in Bosnia are deeper than ever, because the world has not implemented the peace accords that ended the conflict and allowed refugees to return to their homes.
He also said there is paralysis in the Bosnian government because Serb legislators are voting as an ethnic bloc in the country's parliament and blocking progress.
"If we unblock this, we actually have a democracy in Bosnia, not ethnocracy", he declared.
But the former international High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Lord Paddy Ashdown, told Amanpour that the Dayton Accords that ended the war have not failed and in fact have been a success.
"We made more progress in ten years in Bosnia than we did in Northern Ireland in 36 (years)," Ashdown said.
He acknowledged that since 2006, Bosnia has begun to unravel and is now going backwards.
"We have to complete the job. We were, I think, eight-tenths of the way there by 2006, but because the international community and above all Brussels took their eye off the ball, this thing started to unravel backwards again", he added.
"So instead of having progress towards unity, we now have a dangerous dynamic moving the opposite direction towards nationalism, and that may well be reflected in the coming elections."
He said he does not think war will break out again in Bosnia. "The real danger is that Bosnia descends backwards into a black hole of corruption, criminality, and dysfunctionality in the middle of the Balkans."
Ashdown said that U.S. President Barack Obama and the European Union's new so-called foreign minister, Catherine Ashton, must get the political momentum moving again so Bosnia can achieve full membership of "the two great Atlantic institutions" -- NATO and the European Union.
"When it's made those changes, I think people will see it as one of the little jewels of Europe," he added.
Labels:
Bosnian,
court,
deaths,
murder,
racial bias,
racial relations,
religion
Sunday, February 28, 2010
Grenade blast damages Thailand bank-Thai judges say Thaksin abused power for gain
A grenade exploded in Bangkok outside a branch of Thailand's biggest bank
----
A grenade exploded in Bangkok outside a branch of Thailand's biggest bank Saturday, police said, a day after a court verdict against deposed premier Thaksin Shinawatra sparked a security alert.
The blast shattered the windows and doors of the Bangkok Bank branch in the Silom business district but there were no casualties, Metropolitan police spokesman Major General Piya Uthay told AFP.
A second, unexploded grenade was found at another Bangkok Bank branch in the capital and removed by police, Piya said.
Thai authorities said earlier Saturday they were on high alert after the Supreme Court a day earlier confiscated 1.4 billion dollars of Thaksin's fortune for abuse of power.
Hundreds of protesters from the Red Shirt movement loyal to Thaksin surrounded Bangkok Bank's headquarters one week before the verdict, forcing it to close for the day.
They said the bank has links to chief royal adviser and former prime minister Prem Tinsulanonda, whom they accuse of masterminding the 2006 military coup that toppled Thaksin.
On February 14 Thai police defused a bomb near the Supreme Court while a grenade exploded near government offices. Police have not made any arrests yet in connection with the incidents.
Thaksin and his supporters have vowed to fight back against Friday's verdict and the Red Shirts have said they will hold a mass rally in Bangkok in mid-March, although they have promised that their campaign will be non-violent.
A hand grenade exploded in front of a Bangkok Bank branch in central Bangkok Saturday night, leaving one person slightly injured.
According to an anonymous policeman at the scene, a man on a motorcycle passed by and threw a hand grenade toward the branch bank at Silom road, Bangrak district, at about 9:30 p.m., but only hit the tree in front of the bank and exploded.
One man got minor injury and has been sent to the nearby Leart Sin Hospital, the policeman said. The glass doors and windows of the bank were shattered by the wave of the explosion.
Dozens of policeman at the scene are carrying out investigation.
According to Bangkok Post online, another grenade was also found at the Bangkok Bank's Rama II branch at about 10 p.m. and police disposed of the grenade before it exploded.
Judges reading a lengthy verdict on whether to seize $2.3 billion of ex-premier Thaksin Shinawatra family's assets said on Friday his policies benefited his family business, raising the likelihood his money will be confiscated.
Authorities say major violence is unlikely but have mobilised thousands of police and troops to pre-empt any backlash by supporters of the 60-year-old fugitive at the centre of a 5-year political crisis in Southeast Asia's second-biggest economy.
Analysts expect the nine-judge Supreme Court to either seize all of the frozen wealth or to allow Thaksin to keep a portion of the assets. The latter scenario is seen as more favourable for markets in the short-run as it lessens the risk of an imminent showdown in Thailand's divisive colour-coded crisis.
"The partial seizure of the assets should be what financial markets prefer because both sides can claim victory," said Prapas Tonpibulsak, chief investment officer at Ayudhya Fund Management.
Prosecutors say Thaksin and his former wife, Potjaman na Pombejra, concealed ownership of shares in his family business Shin Corp SHIN.BK while in office from 2001 to 2006, and that he abused power by tailoring policies to benefit the company.
Thaksin, ousted in a 2006 coup and convicted in absentia of graft, has denied the charges from self-imposed exile in Dubai.
One judge said a Thaksin-era government policy to convert part of a telecommunications concessions fee into an excise tax "favoured Shin Corp at the expense of the state".
A judge also said Thaksin concealed his ownership of stock in Shin Corp, an argument seen as a main precondition for deciding there was a conflict of interest in government policies benefiting Shin Corp, a major telecommunications business.
"The way it's going, it looks highly likely he will have the whole lot confiscated and he'll not get anything back," said Jade Donavanik, dean of the faculty of law at Siam University.
"The judge has repeatedly said the stock was Thaksin's property. Him concealing assets is the entire foundation of this case, so it's likely they'll take it all."
A final ruling on whether to confiscate any or all of the assets was due later on Friday. Thailand's stock market reopens on Tuesday after a long weekend holiday.
Some analysts say a court verdict unfavourable to Thaksin, could add weight to allegations he is the victim of a political vendetta and may spark an angry response from supporters.
'JUDGMENT DAY'
Security was tight around Bangkok's Supreme Court on what has become known as "Judgment Day", with cellphone signals jammed to prevent remote-detonated bombings and judges ferried to the courthouse, some from safe houses, in bullet-proof cars.
Six-hundred police guarded the court. Security agencies said thousands of riot troops were on standby in case of unrest.
Political uncertainty has subdued Thailand's benchmark index .SETI in recent weeks, with many traders waiting to see what the ruling will bring. But foreign investors were net buyers for four straight days this week, drawn to bargains in Thailand where stocks are trading at just 10.6 times forecast 2011 earnings, Asia's cheapest after Pakistan, Thomson Reuters data shows.
The pro-Thaksin "red shirt" movement, which last April forced a regional summit to be abandoned and staged demonstrations that sparked Thailand's worst street violence in 17 years, plans a mass rally in Bangkok on March 14 but says it will not protest on Friday whatever the verdict.
The delay was widely seen as a move to distance the movement from any groups that might seek to stir up trouble. A splinter pro-Thaksin group, "Red Siam", rallied close to the court on Friday, but has vowed to remain peaceful.
The "red shirts" accuse authorities of playing up the risk of unrest. Security agencies have said they are most concerned outside agitators, or a "third hand", will trigger violence.
The twice-elected Thaksin says he will fight any seizure of the assets from exile.
(For a related analysis click on [ID:nSGE61I095]; and for a factbox on the case click [ID:nSGE61M019])
Although the verdict will turn a new page in an intractable political crisis that has alarmed many investors, few believe it will provide any hope of a long-term resolution.
---
Labels:
angry protest,
bom,
court,
fraud,
terror plots,
terrorists,
thailand,
thaksin
Friday, February 26, 2010
Thai court seizes almost £1bn from Thaksin Shinawatra over 'abuse of power'
Supporters react, above and below, to the news that Shinawatra is to have his assets frozen
Thaksin Shinawatra lashed out at the Thai courts after being told 46.3billion baht of his assets will be frozen
Thailand's top court has frozen 46.3billion baht (£923million) of ousted Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's assets after ruling he had concealed his wealth and abused his power for personal gain.
The court said Thaksin had concealed his ownership of shares in his family telecommunications conglomerate Shin Corp during his five years in office and geared government policies to benefit the company.
But it left him with about $590million, declaring it would be 'unfair' to seize money he amassed before he was made premier.
The amount was far less than expected, a decision that could appease some anti-government forces.
The judges said Thaksin had abused his power in all five major cases against him, which included shaping telecoms and satellite policies, including concessions fees and state loans, to benefit Shin Corp.
Thaksin, the former owner of Manchester City Football Club, was ousted in a 2006 coup and convicted in absentia of graft.
He denied the charges from self-imposed exile in Dubai.
After the verdict, he said he was not surprised. 'The Thai law is like an assumption. It severely fails to meet international standards,' he said in a video-link to about 800 supporters who gathered to rally behind him.
Some of his red-shirted supporters cried or sobbed quietly, while others shouted in frustration and anger.
Authorities said major violence was unlikely in response to the ruling but mobilised thousands of police and troops to pre-empt any backlash by supporters of the 60-year-old fugitive.
'The partial seizure of the assets should be what financial markets prefer because both sides can claim victory,' said Prapas Tonpibulsak, chief investment officer at Ayudhya Fund Management.
Security remained tight around Bangkok's Supreme Court on what has become known as 'Judgment Day', with cellphone signals jammed to prevent remote-detonated bombings and judges ferried to the courthouse, some from safe houses, in bullet-proof cars.
Six-hundred police guarded the court. Security agencies said thousands of riot troops were on standby in case of unrest.
Thaksin's critics will see the guilty verdict as the culmination of a process to cleanse Thai politics that began with protests in 2006 calling for his ousting for alleged corruption, which segued into a military coup in September that year.
They also accuse him of disrespecting the country's constitutional monarch, 82-year-old King Bhumibol Adulyadej.
His supporters will view the ruling as the latest in a series of injustices that drove a democratically elected leader from office despite two sweeping election victories.
They believe he is being persecuted because the traditional urban ruling class felt threatened when he empowered the country's rural majority, which was grateful for Thaksin's innovative social welfare programmes.
Labels:
angry protest,
court,
politic,
thailand,
thaksin
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Defendant forced to wear Hannibal Lecter-style mask in court after spitting on judge
Restraint: Joshua Beadle appears in a Memphis court wearing the bizarre mask
Beadle was also gaining a reputation in prison as a spitter - so officials decided it was time to take precautions.
He was fitted with a special nylon-and-mesh beekeeper-style face mask rather reminiscent of the muzzle that actor Anthony Hopkins wore while playing the cannibal doctor Hannibal Lector in the hit film The Silence of the Lambs.
Beadle has had to wear the bizarre-looking mask for his court appearances ever since.
He is representing himself in court after having trouble retaining representation.
His lawyer, Larry Sargent, was excused from the case after telling the court that Beadle had threatened to add him to the list of people he intended to kill when he got out of jail.
Chilling: Beadle's mask is reminiscent of the one Anthony Hopkins wore as Hannibal Lecter
A man has been forced to wear a Hannibal Lecter-style head-dress to court after spitting at the judge.
Joshua Beadle, 24, who is on trial in Memphis, Tennessee for a 2005 burglary, was forced to wear the bizarre headgear after he spat at a judge last year, barely missing him but dousing a clerk's computer.
Beadle was also gaining a reputation in prison as a spitter - so officials decided it was time to take precautions.
He was fitted with a special nylon-and-mesh beekeeper-style face mask rather reminiscent of the muzzle that actor Anthony Hopkins wore while playing the cannibal doctor Hannibal Lector in the hit film The Silence of the Lambs.
Beadle has had to wear the bizarre-looking mask for his court appearances ever since.
He is representing himself in court after having trouble retaining representation.
His lawyer, Larry Sargent, was excused from the case after telling the court that Beadle had threatened to add him to the list of people he intended to kill when he got out of jail.
Labels:
Cambridge police,
court,
criminals,
investigation,
Police,
terror plots
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Trials costing $200m-a-year threaten to strip New York of 9/11 terror cases
An airliner takes aim at one of the towers
The Twin Towers on 9/11
Estimates of a £200m-a-year bill to host the trials of 9/11 terror suspects are threatening to force them out of New York altogether.
In a letter this month, Mayor Michael Bloomberg warned of the likely cost of securing the city during the court cases which could push them out of the scene of the crime.
It is more than double the original estimate and officials were again forced to think twice when New York's chief policeman detailed the huge security arrangements which would have to be put in place.
Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly described the planned operation for lower Manhattan to officials on Friday.
Proposals included inner and outer cordons as well as thousands of officers, mobile guard towers, vehicle checkpoints, sniffer dogs sensitive to bombs, rooftop snipers and helicopter surveillance.
Constant radiation sweeps would detect attacks with dirty bombs.
'That was the first time they heard it in one fell swoop, so to speak, and it raised their concerns,' he said.
The Obama administration has been cornered into rethinking the idea that the city itself should host the biggest terrorist atrocity it and America has ever seen.
It now faces the task of finding a more suitable home for the high-profile trial.
The argument over what proportion of the city's day-to-day security costs should be met by Washington has raged ever since the attacks in 2001, with the federal government claiming it contributes enough as it spreads resources around the entire nation.
Bloomberg's letter to the office of management and budget in Washington was simply the latest round of point scoring in that fight.
The letter said the security costs for the trials of mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators would hit $216m in the first year and $200m a year after that.
The huge sum arises mainly from overtime payments for extra police patrols.
'As 9/11 was an attack on the entire nation, we need the federal government to shoulder the significant costs we will incur and ease this burden,' Bloomberg wrote.
Then in a speech a week later Kelly highlighted the risk that terrorists could use the trials to earn maximum publicity by attempting to strike another blow.
He predicted the public backlash over the arrangements and huge financial penalties would most likely prevent the trial being held in the city. Then two Obama officials confirmed alternate locations were being looked at.
But Patrick Rowan, once the top counter terrorism official in the Bush Justice Department, said holding it elsewhere could be just as problematic.
'If it's too risky to hold a major terrorism trial in downtown Manhattan, then they're going to face the same argument from civic leaders in other metropolitan areas.
'If you follow the logic behind this decision, they may quickly find themselves in a position where they need to create a single facility, perhaps on a military base in the middle of a cornfield.'
Labels:
911,
court,
New york,
terror plots,
terrorists
Friday, January 29, 2010
U.S. government weighs other sites for 9/11 trial
The Obama administration has begun looking for places other than the heart of New York City to prosecute the accused Sept. 11 attack plotters in the face of fierce criticism tied to security and costs, U.S. officials said on Friday.
Critics have said the government's plan to try self-professed mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators blocks from the World Trade Center would require a large security cordon, hurt area businesses and afford the defendants certain legal rights in criminal court.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was considering other venues for the trials, according to one Obama administration official. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said: "We're considering our options."
The New York Times and Washington Post reported that the lower Manhattan courthouse was out of the running, citing unnamed administration officials. However, one Obama administration official told Reuters that "no decision has been made."
Holder in November decided the trials would be held in New York City, whose federal courthouse is connected to a fortified detention center with a tunnel.
"Conversations have occurred with the administration to discuss contingency options should the possibility of a trial in lower Manhattan be foreclosed upon by Congress or locally," another administration official said.
New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly told reporters he believed the trials are "unlikely" to occur there.
It was not clear what other venues are under consideration. New York officials have suggested a military base, the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York, or nearby Governor's Island, though some said that last option was not feasible.
A U.S. official has said that no terrorism trials had been held outside of a federal courthouse and there were questions whether a trial could be held on a military base.
PRESSURE ON OBAMA
The decision to reconsider the location comes as President Barack Obama faces increased political pressure to refocus his agenda. Obama has been trying to push through a healthcare reform initiative and reduce the high U.S. unemployment rate.
Earlier this week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg reversed his support for holding the trials in Manhattan.
"I can tell you I would prefer if it was done elsewhere, I think some of the suggestions make sense, like a military base, because it's far away from people and you can provide security easily," Bloomberg said on Friday on his weekly radio show.
He said he called the Obama administration on Thursday to express his concerns but acknowledged ultimately the city could handle the trials. "I will be as supportive as, and the city will be, as supportive as we can, period," Bloomberg said.
New York Governor David Paterson has also been hesitant about the trials in Manhattan. "We are worried about the effects of mass law enforcement on lower Manhattan, congestion, traffic, resources that have to be spent," he told reporters.
Administration officials have pointed to past terrorism trials that were held in U.S. courts with little difficulty, including one this week of a Pakistani scientist charged with firing a rifle at U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan.
Those entering that courtroom have faced airport-style security: removing shoes and belts, passing through a metal detector and having purses and other personal items searched.
HIGH COST
Bloomberg has estimated the cost of security for the Sept. 11 trials to be at least $200 million a year, and has asked the Obama administration to pick up the tab.
That could be tough for Obama because he has had enormous trouble getting the U.S. Congress -- despite big Democratic majorities in the Senate and the House of Representatives -- to approve funding for his bid to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where terrorism suspects are held.
Republicans and even some of Obama's fellow Democrats have ramped up pressure in recent weeks against the planned criminal trials, urging that the alleged Sept. 11 plotters be tried in military tribunals instead.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham plans to offer legislation next week aimed at barring funding for the Sept. 11 trials in civilian court. They "should be tried by military commission -- not civilian court where they will be given the same legal rights as American citizens," he said.
In addition to security concerns, some lawmakers -- as well as some relatives of the almost 3,000 people who were killed in the Sept. 11 attacks -- have said the defendants could use the criminal courts as soapboxes to propagate their anti-American beliefs and turn the trials into a media circus.
But Holder testified to Congress last year that the judges who will preside over the trials will be able to prevent such a scenario.
--------
-----
-----
Critics have said the government's plan to try self-professed mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four alleged co-conspirators blocks from the World Trade Center would require a large security cordon, hurt area businesses and afford the defendants certain legal rights in criminal court.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was considering other venues for the trials, according to one Obama administration official. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said: "We're considering our options."
The New York Times and Washington Post reported that the lower Manhattan courthouse was out of the running, citing unnamed administration officials. However, one Obama administration official told Reuters that "no decision has been made."
Holder in November decided the trials would be held in New York City, whose federal courthouse is connected to a fortified detention center with a tunnel.
"Conversations have occurred with the administration to discuss contingency options should the possibility of a trial in lower Manhattan be foreclosed upon by Congress or locally," another administration official said.
New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly told reporters he believed the trials are "unlikely" to occur there.
It was not clear what other venues are under consideration. New York officials have suggested a military base, the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York, or nearby Governor's Island, though some said that last option was not feasible.
A U.S. official has said that no terrorism trials had been held outside of a federal courthouse and there were questions whether a trial could be held on a military base.
PRESSURE ON OBAMA
The decision to reconsider the location comes as President Barack Obama faces increased political pressure to refocus his agenda. Obama has been trying to push through a healthcare reform initiative and reduce the high U.S. unemployment rate.
Earlier this week, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg reversed his support for holding the trials in Manhattan.
"I can tell you I would prefer if it was done elsewhere, I think some of the suggestions make sense, like a military base, because it's far away from people and you can provide security easily," Bloomberg said on Friday on his weekly radio show.
He said he called the Obama administration on Thursday to express his concerns but acknowledged ultimately the city could handle the trials. "I will be as supportive as, and the city will be, as supportive as we can, period," Bloomberg said.
New York Governor David Paterson has also been hesitant about the trials in Manhattan. "We are worried about the effects of mass law enforcement on lower Manhattan, congestion, traffic, resources that have to be spent," he told reporters.
Administration officials have pointed to past terrorism trials that were held in U.S. courts with little difficulty, including one this week of a Pakistani scientist charged with firing a rifle at U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan.
Those entering that courtroom have faced airport-style security: removing shoes and belts, passing through a metal detector and having purses and other personal items searched.
HIGH COST
Bloomberg has estimated the cost of security for the Sept. 11 trials to be at least $200 million a year, and has asked the Obama administration to pick up the tab.
That could be tough for Obama because he has had enormous trouble getting the U.S. Congress -- despite big Democratic majorities in the Senate and the House of Representatives -- to approve funding for his bid to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where terrorism suspects are held.
Republicans and even some of Obama's fellow Democrats have ramped up pressure in recent weeks against the planned criminal trials, urging that the alleged Sept. 11 plotters be tried in military tribunals instead.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham plans to offer legislation next week aimed at barring funding for the Sept. 11 trials in civilian court. They "should be tried by military commission -- not civilian court where they will be given the same legal rights as American citizens," he said.
In addition to security concerns, some lawmakers -- as well as some relatives of the almost 3,000 people who were killed in the Sept. 11 attacks -- have said the defendants could use the criminal courts as soapboxes to propagate their anti-American beliefs and turn the trials into a media circus.
But Holder testified to Congress last year that the judges who will preside over the trials will be able to prevent such a scenario.
--------
-----
-----
Labels:
911,
al qaeda,
al-Qaida,
court,
New york,
protestors,
terror plots,
terrorists
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
