My World Earth News Headline Animator

My World Earth News
Showing posts with label admiral mike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label admiral mike. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Pentagon to shut military command, cut jobs


The Pentagon, trying to free up cash in the face of a yawning US deficit, unveiled a series of cost-cutting measures tomorrow that will shed thousands of jobs and shut down an entire military command.

Defence Secretary Robert Gates said he hoped the shakeup would show Congress that the Pentagon would spend tax dollars wisely during tough economic times and address long-standing concerns about wasteful expenditure.

But Gates (picture) warned in some of his strongest language yet against any future effort to actually cut overall defence spending, which is still growing, but at a much slower rate than it did in the years after the September 11, 2001 attacks.





“My greatest fear is that in economic tough times that people will see the defence budget as the place to solve the nation’s deficit problems,” Gates said.

“As I look around the world and see a more unstable world, more failed and failing states, countries that are investing heavily in their militaries ... I think that would be disastrous.”

The US budget gap hit a record US$1.41 trillion (RM4.5 trillion) in fiscal 2009 and is poised to grow wider this year, unnerving many Americans grappling with unemployment at a lofty 9.5 per cent.

But many of the proposed cuts are also almost certain to upset members of Congress, who face the potential loss of jobs in their home districts in an election year.

Beyond US fiscal constraints, Pentagon officials are also mindful that their budget will come under increased scrutiny as the United States winds down the war in Iraq. President Barack Obama has announced plans to start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan starting in July 2011, conditions permitting.

Gates said it was important not to repeat past mistakes where economic troubles or “the winding down of a military campaign leads to steep and unwise reductions in defence.”

“If you were to graph the defence budget going back the last 40 or 50 years, it would look like the EKG of a fibrillating heart,” he said.

“What we need is modest, sustainable growth over a prolonged period of time that allows us to make sensible investment decisions.”

Pentagon officials declined to say how much the measures would save exactly but described them as part of a previously announced effort to free up more than US$100 billion to sustain US forces and upgrade its arsenal over the next five years.

The cost-cutting initiatives include scaling back the number of generals across the US military and slashing funds for Defence Department contractors by 10 per cent each year for the next three years — a potentially massive reduction involving thousands of people.

Obama, in a statement, praised the announcement as part of Gates’ efforts to “reform the way the Pentagon does business.”

“The funds saved will help us sustain the current force structure and make needed investments in modernisation in a fiscally responsible way,” Obama said.

Gates also asked the armed forces to identify US military bases for closure and said he was shutting down the US Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), which has 2,800 US military and civilian staff and about 3,000 contractors.

Four-star General Ray Odierno, who is now overseeing the drawdown in Iraq, was slated to assume the helm of JFCOM after he leaves Baghdad in September.

“I told Ray that his assignment at JFCOM is essentially the same as his assignment in Iraq, and that is working himself out of a job,” Gates joked.

Senator Jim Webb, one of Obama’s Democrats and a prominent member of the Senate’s armed services committee, was critical of the effort to close down JFCOM, which is based in his home state of Virginia.

“It goes without saying that we should achieve efficiency in our nation’s defence budget,” Webb said.

“However doing so at the expense of the command that is leading the charge for the future of our military doctrine and training would be a step backward and could be harmful to the capabilities of the finest military in the world.”



Monday, August 2, 2010

U.S. military chief warns of attack option against Iran


Photobucket
War option: America's top military chief Admiral Mike Mullen said a military strike is an option against Iran

America's top military chief has warned that the country has a plan to attack Iran.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a military strike is an option if Tehran presses ahead with plans to build a nuclear weapon.

While admitting that going to war could destabilise the Middle East, Admiral Mullen said the risk of allowing the Iranian regime's atomic ambitions to continue unchecked was unacceptable.






Admiral Mullen told a television news programme: 'Military actions have been on the table and remain on the table.

'I hope we don't get to that but it's an important option.'

He added he was 'extremely concerned' about the possible repercussions of such a strike in 'an incredibly unstable part of the world', but didn't elaborate on any details of the war plan.

The Pentagon chief said he hoped that diplomatic efforts and sanctions against Iran would force Tehran to shelve its nuclear enrichment programme.

Iran insists its attempts to gain nuclear energy are purely to create electricity, but the U.S. and Western powers claim that is just a cover for its attempts to build a nuclear warhead.

Israel has consistently warned that the option of attacking Iran must remain on the table.

The Iranian envoy to the United Nations, Mohammad Khazai Kashmar, warned yesterday that 'Tel Aviv and the entire war front' would be 'set on fire' if the Israelis dared to attack the country.




Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Admiral Mullen in Afghan war zone as US gears up for Kandahar

Photobucket
Admiral Mike Mullen (R) speaks with Helmand Province Governor Mohammad Gulab Mangal

Photobucket
Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen (R) shakes hands with a local Afghan elder in Marjah

Photobucket
A map locating Kandahar in Afghanistan


The top US military commander on Tuesday visited Marjah, the frontline of US-led operations against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan, where a battle for Kandahar is already ramping up.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, arrived in the battle zone a day after President Barack Obama left Afghanistan after a surprise visit, pledging to defeat the Taliban and "to get the job done".

Operations in the farming community of Marjah, set in poppy fields and desert in Helmand province, are the first test of Obama's counter-insurgency campaign aimed at ending an increasingly deadly war now into its ninth year.

Mullen met Helmand governor Gulab Mangal, with whom he discussed the progress of military operations, and pledged support for local security and development, provincial spokesman Daud Ahmadi told AFP.

Mullen, who wore US Navy fatigues, and Mangal also met local leaders in a "shura" or community conference, where they heard concerns of Marjah residents including complaints that promised schools and clinics were not yet operating.

An Afghan journalist at the meeting said the Marjah elders complained that the road to provincial capital Lashkar Gah, less than 20 kilometres (12 miles) away, had not reopened since fighting began on February 13.

The United States and allies have boosted their troop numbers to 126,000, with the number set to peak at 150,000 by August as the fight expands into neighbouring Kandahar province, the heartland of the insurgency.

Obama has said he wants to start drawing down American troops from the middle of next year, putting pressure on Afghan President Hamid Karzai to take over responsibility for security by then.

The US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, told Obama earlier this month that he would take on Taliban militants in Kandahar when enough reinforcements were in place.

Military and political efforts against the Taliban around Kandahar, Afghanistan's third biggest city and the Islamist militia's spiritual capital, have "been long under way," a senior NATO officer in Kabul confirmed.

"There's roughly today on the ground about 8,000 coalition troops and 12,000 Afghans in the Kandahar fight," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"In the last two months we've had a tremendous impact on the major approaches into Kandahar to try to squeeze the Taliban's access," he said, claiming that up to "70 significant mid- to high-level Taliban have been taken off the streets of Kandahar in the last several months".

A US Army brigade would boost the coalition force in Kandahar to 11,000 by June, he said. In the city of one million, he said, Afghan police would shoulder the main burden to evict the Taliban and keep them at bay.

"We have never had the force density in Kandahar to really own all the extreme approaches. With forces that have gone in there we have been able to really slice down on a lot of the traditional avenues into Kandahar itself," he said.

The arrival of additional forces would see current operations accelerate, with the aim of clearing the city and its surrounds of Taliban operatives by the religious fasting month of Ramadan, beginning in mid-August.

The campaign follows the launch of Operation Mushtarak in Marjah on February 13, where six weeks later troops are still coming under fire and being targeted by bomb attacks despite efforts to restore Afghan government control.

Upon his return to Washington from Afghanistan, Obama stressed the immediate need for progress in the country, torn by three decades of conflict and nearly a decade of US-led intervention.

He pressed Karzai, who won a new five-year term in fraud-tainted elections in August, to step up the fight against corruption and the drugs trade, and invited the Afghan leader to visit Washington on May 12.

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Admiral Mullen in Afghan war zone as US gears up for Kandahar

Photobucket
Mullen arrived in the battle zone a day after President Barack Obama left Afghanistan after a surprise visit


Photobucket
The United States and allies have boosted their troop numbers to 126,000


The top US military commander on Tuesday visited Marjah, the frontline of US-led operations against the Taliban in southern Afghanistan where a battle for Kandahar is already ramping up.

Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, arrived in the battle zone a day after President Barack Obama left Afghanistan after a surprise visit, pledging to defeat the Taliban and "to get the job done".

Operations in the farming community of Marjah, set in poppy fields and desert in Helmand province, are the first test of Obama's counter-insurgency campaign aimed at ending an increasingly deadly war now into its ninth year.

"Admiral Mullen is in Marjah," said Lieutenant Colonel Todd Breasseale, a spokesman for NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

Further details of his visit were not immediately released.

The United States and allies have boosted their troop numbers to 126,000, with the number set to peak at 150,000 by August as the fight expands into neighbouring Kandahar province, the heartland of the insurgency.

Obama has said he wants to start drawing down American troops from the middle of next year, putting pressure on Afghan President Hamid Karzai to take over responsibility for security by then.

The US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, told Obama by video conference earlier this month that he would take on Taliban militants in Kandahar when enough reinforcements were in place.

Military and political efforts against the Taliban around Kandahar, Afghanistan's third biggest city and the Islamist militia's spiritual capital, have "been long under way," a senior NATO officer in Kabul confirmed.

"There's roughly today on the ground about 8,000 coalition troops and 12,000 Afghans in the Kandahar fight," he said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

"In the last two months we've had a tremendous impact on the major approaches into Kandahar to try to squeeze the Taliban's access," he said, claiming that up to "70 significant mid- to high-level Taliban have been taken off the streets of Kandahar in the last several months".

A US Army brigade would boost the coalition force in Kandahar to 11,000 by June, he said. In the city of one million, he said, Afghan police would shoulder the main burden to evict the Taliban and keep them at bay.

"We have never had the force density in Kandahar to really own all the extreme approaches. With forces that have gone in there we have been able to really slice down on a lot of the traditional avenues into Kandahar itself," he said.

The arrival of additional forces would see current operations accelerate, with the aim of clearing the city and its surrounds of Taliban operatives by the religious fasting month of Ramadan, beginning in mid-August.

The campaign follows the launch of Operation Mushtarak in Marjah on February 13, where six weeks later troops are still coming under fire and being targeted by bomb attacks despite efforts to restore Afghan government control.

Upon his return to Washington from Afghanistan, Obama stressed the immediate need for progress in the country, torn by three decades of conflict and nearly a decade of US-led intervention.

"I think he is listening," Obama said of Karzai, who won a new five-year term in fraud-tainted elections in August.

"But I think that the progress is too slow, and what we've been trying to emphasize is the fierce urgency of now," Obama said in an interview with NBC television.

He pressed Karzai to step up the fight against corruption and the drugs trade, and invited the Afghan leader to visit Washington on May 12.




Sunday, December 6, 2009

Barack Obama’s deadline to bring troops home from Afghanistan starts to slip

imagebam.com
U.S. soldiers patrol through the heart of Kabul, Afghanistan on Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009. Many Afghans were still sleeping when President Barack Obama announced he was sending 30,000 more U.S. troops to the war. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, said NATO and U.S. forces would hand over responsibility for securing the country to the Afghan security forces "as rapidly as conditions allow." Obama said if conditions are right, U.S. troops could begin leaving Afghanistan in 18 months.
imagebam.com
A man sits and watches President Barack Obama's speech on TV sets at a Yamada Denki electric appliance store in Tokyo, Japan, Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009. Obama announced he would deepen the U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, sending 30,000 more troops to fight the Taliban despite Americans' growing pessimism about the war.

imagebam.com
U.S. soldiers and service members listen to U.S. President Barack Obama's speech on TV at the U.S. Camp Eggers in Kabul, Afghanistan, Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009.

imagebam.com
U.S. Army soldiers walk towards a motor pool as an Afghan army soldier watches above at Forward Operating Base Airborne, near the town of Maidan Shar, Wardak province, Afghanistan Wednesday Dec. 2, 2009. President Barack Obama ordered an additional 30,000 U.S. troops into the long war in Afghanistan, nearly tripling the force he inherited as commander in chief.

imagebam.com
U.S. Army soldiers talk to each other before leaving on patrol at Forward Operating Base Airborne, near the town of Maidan Shar, Wardak province, Afghanistan Wednesday Dec. 2, 2009. President Barack Obama ordered an additional 30,000 U.S. troops into the long war in Afghanistan, nearly tripling the force he inherited as commander in chief.

imagebam.com
U.S. soldiers listen to President Barack Obama's speech on TV at the U.S. Camp Eggers in Kabul, Afghanistan on Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009.

imagebam.com
A U.S. Army soldier watches excerpts from President Barack Obama's speech about Afghanistan at a nearly empty dining facility at Forward Operating Base Airborne, near the town of Maidan Shar, Wardak province, Afghanistan Wednesday Dec. 2, 2009.

imagebam.com
An Afghan police officer, seen through a window of a U.S. Humvee armored vehicle, stands guard in Kabul, Afghanistan on Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009. Many Afghans were still sleeping when President Barack Obama announced he was sending 30,000 more U.S. troops to the war. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, said NATO and U.S. forces would hand over responsibility for securing the country to the Afghan security forces "as rapidly as conditions allow." Obama said if conditions are right, U.S. troops could begin leaving Afghanistan in 18 months.



President Obama’s July 2011 date to begin pulling troops out of Afghanistan appeared to be slipping yesterday after senior US officials conceded that the deadline was not to be set in stone and that American and Nato forces will remain there for at least five more years.

The comments by Robert Gates, Mr Obama’s Defence Secretary, and Hillary Clinton, the US Secretary of State, followed criticism last week by Bob Ainsworth in an interview with The Times that setting a date to start withdrawing forces was unwise.

The British Defence Secretary told The Times: “You can’t put a time on it. You’ve got to look at conditions.” In an interview in the US yesterday, Mr Gates said that the July 2011 date was not arbitrary.

Mr Gates added: “The pace of ... bringing them home will depend on the circumstances on the ground. Those judgments will be made by our commanders in the field.”


Mrs Clinton said: “We’re not talking about an exit strategy or a drop-dead deadline. What we’re talking about is an assessment that ... we can begin a transition, a transition to hand off responsibility to the Afghan forces.”

Mr Obama, when he announced last week a date to begin bringing US forces home within 18 months of his surge of 30,000 additional troops, also said that withdrawal would be conditional on how things looked on the ground.

Yet that caveat was buried in the larger message of the withdrawal date. Mr Gates and Mrs Clinton focused much more on how conditional the withdrawal date is, suggesting that the deadline was little more than a gesture to assuage anti-war liberals in Mr Obama’s own Democratic Party.

Mr Gates noted that President Karzai had said in his recent inaugural address that Afghan security forces should take over control of important areas of the country within three years and assume total responsibility within five years.

Mr Gates said that the initial US troop withdrawal in July 2011 might only involve a small number of forces.

---------

----------

-------

-------

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Obama: No quick decision on troops to Afghan- Need for training of Afganisthan security force in view of increase insurgents


President Obama said he is not rushing to send more troops to Afghanistan without knowing full details of the strategies involved. Increase criticism from home against sending more troops.


Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan , mention a charge in strategic methods in Afganisthan is required. Success is achievable. Already acknowledge that ground insurgents have increase in Afghanistan. Also change have reduce bombing by air strike to reduce ciliavian casulities but indirectly exposing ground troops to casualities.



US troops deployed in Afganisthan. Increase in bombing and attack of insurgents in Afganisthan causing more troops casualities and distability to Afganisthan to Taliban insurgents.


Adm. Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, taking his seat before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday. Requesting more troops to train the Afganisthan force and local police.


Above, Afghan girls queue to have their nails colored by an American soldier on patrol with German ISAF soldiers. Admiral Mullen says the growing complexity of the war necessitates more troops.

President Barack Obama said Wednesday there will be no quick decision on whether to send more U.S. troops into the widening war in Afghanistan, saying "my determination is to get this right."

The president's comments came one day after Adm. Mike Mullen, his top military adviser as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, endorsed an increase in U.S. forces as likely necessary to battle a deepening insurgency. The U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, also has delivered a grim assessment of the war and is expected to follow up soon with a request for thousands of additional troops.

Obama said he is still considering an assessment he received this month from Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, and will await reviews from civilian and diplomatic officials and the results of the disputed Afghan election before making "further decisions moving forward."

Lawmakers have voiced increasing anxiety over the administration's war strategy, demanding more information about McChrystal's recommendations, including the need for additional forces. Some have called for a significant troop increase, while others have asked for a withdrawal timetable. Public opinion polls have indicated diminished support for the war, even as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, said Tuesday that more troops will probably be needed.

Why need to increase?

“I want to underline the fact that this is a matter of national security,” said Representative Ike Skelton, a Missouri Democrat who is chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. “We ought to listen to General McChrystal, and I’m of the opinion to give him what he needs.”

Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the Senate Armed Services Committee this week that the war effort probably would require additional U.S. troops to stem the insurgency and train enough Afghan security forces to ultimately take over.

Mullen said that while McChrystal hasn’t submitted a request for more troops and equipment, increasing the size of the Afghan army and police probably would require 2,000 to 4,000 more trainers than the U.S. and its allies have on the ground now.

“But I do believe that — having heard his views and having great confidence in his leadership — a properly resourced counterinsurgency probably means more forces, and, without question, more time and more commitment to the protection of the Afghan people and to the development of good governance,” Admiral Mullen said.

Response from Home ?

A range of officials have said that the White House hopes to have at least several weeks before having to deal with any request for more forces for Afghanistan — and the political implications of such a request here at home. But Tuesday’s debate on Capitol Hill, which framed the arguments for how to shape the mission, indicates that the sweeping public discussion is already under way.

Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary, said Tuesday that Mr. Gates’s initial opposition to expanding the American “footprint” in Afghanistan had at least been softened.A group of about 4,000 trainers is scheduled to arrive in Afghanistan by November, bringing the American troop level there to 68,000.

Previously, Mr. Gates expressed apprehension over a force so sizable that Afghans would view the Americans as occupiers. Now, Mr. Morrell said, the defense secretary was taking to heart General McChrystal’s “explanation that it’s not so much the size of the force, but the behavior of the force that determines whether or not it is accepted by the Afghan people.”

During Admiral Mullen’s appearance before the Armed Services Committee, Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the committee’s chairman, laid out the emerging position of Congressional Democrats by insisting that accelerated efforts to train and equip Afghan security forces should precede any deployment of American troops beyond those already committed by the Obama administration. Mr. Levin’s stance is expected to have great sway because he is the committee’s chairman and the most powerful Democrat in Congress on military matters. Many House Democrats also oppose sending more troops.

But the committee’s ranking Republican, Senator John McCain of Arizona, countered by asserting that more troops were “vitally needed” in Afghanistan and that any delay in ordering more combat forces to the fight would put American lives at risk.

Admiral Mullen acknowledged the importance of the training effort advocated by Mr. Levin, but said that such a mission could not quickly provide the level of security required by the new counterinsurgency strategy.

“Quality training takes time and patience,” he continued. “Private trust by the Afghans — so vital to our purpose — is not fostered in a public hurry.”

Mr. McCain staked out an opposing view. He recalled that initial attempts in Iraq to shift the security burden to local forces from American forces were a colossal failure. “I’ve seen that movie before,” he said.

New goals for Afghanistan security force?

Mr. Levin said new goals should be established for Afghan security forces. The army, he said, should grow to 250,000 troops by the end of 2012, and the police to 160,000 officers by that date. The current targets are 134,000 army troops and 96,000 police officers by the end of next year.


---------

-----------

-------------




Thursday, September 3, 2009

Not yet time to leave Afganisthan.Still got limited time to change approach and victory is achievebale.


Robert Gates and Mike Mullen both warned of limited time in Afghanistan


The situation in Afghanistan is serious, but success is achievable


NATO supply trucks wrecked in an explosion Sunday sit in Chaman, Pakistan. The vehicles were originally bound for Afghanistan.


Only now does the US have sufficient resources on the ground to start implementing President Barack Obama's new Afghan strategy, Mr Gates said.

His comments come days after the top US general in Afghanistan called for a fresh approach to the conflict.

Gen Stanley McChrystal said success was possible, but strategy must change.

Days after receiving Gen McChrystal's detailed report into the Afghan conflict, Mr Gates spoke in defence of Mr Obama's approach to Afghanistan at a Pentagon news conference with Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Later on Friday British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is due to restate his commitment to Afghanistan in a major speech.


Speaking at the Pentagon, Mr Gates said firmly: "I don't believe that the war is slipping through the administration's fingers."

"I absolutely do not think it is time to get out of Afghanistan," he said, but cautioned that there remains "limited time for us to show that... this approach is working".


Alongside his civilian boss, Adm Mullen repeated the charge that for years the mission in Afghanistan was poorly funded and staffed.

"Part of why it has gotten more serious and has deteriorated has been directly tied to that," he said. But the situation could be turned around in the next 12 to 18 months, he said.

Speaking of the possibility of increasing the number of US troops even further, Mr Gates said he would only consider that option if Afghans felt reassured by a larger military presence.

He reiterated that the danger posed by al-Qaeda and the Taliban was the main reason for the continuing US presence in Afghanistan.


In a speech on the war, which has claimed 212 British lives since 2001, Prime Minister Mr Brown will say: "When the security of our country is at stake we cannot walk away."

In a strategic assessment sent to US leaders in August but yet to be published officially, Gen Stanley McChrystal, who was appointed as US commander in Afghanistan earlier this year, called for a new approach.

"The situation in Afghanistan is serious, but success is achievable and demands a revised implementation strategy, commitment and resolve, and increased unity of effort," Gen McChrystal wrote.





--------





-----------



------------------

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

My Headlines World News Today

Celebrity Gossip Scandal News

Celebrity Uncensored Leaked Scandal News Photos